I can already hear the responses. I can hear my former colleagues in Ballarat saying, “Oh, come on, Donna.” I can hear my mum, who trained as a nurse in Bendigo in the 1980s, making that particular sound she makes when she thinks I’m being dramatic. I can hear every Australian nurse who’s ever worked a brutal forty-degree Christmas Day shift in an understaffed regional ED thinking, “You moved to London and now you think you’re better than us?”
So let me be clear, right from the top: that is not what I’m saying. I am not saying Australian nursing is inferior. I am not saying Australian nurses are less skilled, less dedicated, or less capable than their British counterparts. Some of the finest clinicians I have ever worked alongside were in Daylesford and Ballarat, and I will defend Australian nursing until my last breath.
What I am saying – and I will stand by it, even knowing it will ruffle feathers – is that two years working in the NHS, specifically at Great Ormond Street Hospital, accelerated my professional growth in ways that ten years in the Australian system did not and, given its structure, probably could not. That’s not a criticism of Australia. It’s an observation about what happens when you take a competent nurse and drop her into an environment so far outside her comfort zone that growth isn’t optional. It becomes survival.
The Comfortable Trap of Competence
Here’s something nobody warns you about when you’re good at your job: competence can become its own ceiling. In Ballarat, by the time I left, I was a highly effective emergency nurse. I knew the department inside out. I knew which consultants preferred a phone call and which preferred a page. I knew where the spare cannulas were hidden when the supply room was locked. I could run a resuscitation bay on autopilot, not because I was careless but because I’d done it so many times that the steps lived in my muscles rather than my conscious mind.
That sounds like expertise, and in many ways it was. But there’s a subtle danger in that kind of fluency. When everything is familiar, you stop being challenged. When you stop being challenged, you stop growing. And when you stop growing, you don’t notice – because you’re still performing well. You’re still getting good feedback. You’re still, by every measurable standard, a good nurse. You’re just not becoming a better one.
I didn’t recognise this while I was in it. You rarely do. It was only when I landed at GOSH, stripped of every familiar system and routine and forced to rebuild my practice from the foundations up, that I understood how long I’d been coasting on competence rather than actively developing.
The Myth of Experience as a Linear Path
There’s an assumption in nursing – in most professions, really – that experience accumulates in a straight line. Year one, you know a little. Year five, you know more. Year ten, you know a lot. And there’s truth in that, up to a point. But what I’ve come to believe is that experience in the same environment has diminishing returns. Your first two years in any role are rich with learning. Years three through five consolidate that learning. And somewhere around year six or seven, unless the environment itself is pushing you into new territory, you begin recycling the same skills rather than building new ones.
I was recycling. I didn’t know it, but I was. My tenth year of nursing in Australia didn’t teach me as much as my first year in London, and it wasn’t close. That’s not because Australian nursing lacks complexity. It’s because I had already absorbed the complexity my environment had to offer. I needed a new environment to find new edges.
What London Taught Me That Australia Couldn’t
The specific things I learned at GOSH could fill a book, but the ones that fundamentally changed my practice come down to three areas: structured clinical communication, exposure to complexity, and the discipline of practising in a system where nothing is assumed.
Structured communication – SBAR, escalation frameworks, the whole architecture of NHS information transfer – made me a safer nurse. I’ve written about this before in this series, so I won’t rehearse it at length. But the difference it made was profound. In Australia, I was a good communicator by instinct. In London, I became a good communicator by design. Instinct is wonderful until you’re exhausted at hour eleven of a night shift and your instincts are foggy. Design holds up when instinct falters, and that distinction, I am convinced, saves lives.
Exposure to complexity reshaped my clinical thinking entirely. GOSH sees conditions that most hospitals in the world will never encounter. Working in that environment meant that my threshold for what constituted a complex presentation shifted dramatically. Cases that would have sent me reaching for the phone in Ballarat became cases I could assess, plan for, and initiate management on independently. Not because I’m inherently more talented than I was two years ago, but because my frame of reference expanded enormously.
The System That Assumes Nothing
The third area is harder to articulate, but it might be the most important. The NHS, for all its well-documented pressures, operates on a principle that I think Australian healthcare – particularly in regional settings – doesn’t emphasise enough: assume nothing, document everything, verify constantly.
In Daylesford, we assumed a lot. We assumed the next nurse would know Mrs Henderson’s history because everyone knew Mrs Henderson. We assumed the doctor would remember the conversation we’d had in the corridor. We assumed continuity would carry the information that our documentation didn’t. And most of the time, those assumptions held. But “most of the time” is not good enough in healthcare, and London taught me that with a clarity that a decade of safe outcomes in a familiar system never could.
I now document as though the next person reading my notes has never met the patient, has never spoken to me, and has no context whatsoever. I communicate as though every handover is the first and last chance to transfer critical information. I verify as though every assumption is a potential error. These habits didn’t come from a textbook. They came from working in an environment where the consequences of getting it wrong were visible every single day.
Why This Take Is Controversial – And Why I’m Not Backing Down
I know why this argument is uncomfortable. It sounds like I’m saying Australian nursing isn’t good enough. It sounds ungrateful. It sounds like the worst kind of expat arrogance – the person who moves overseas and suddenly thinks everything back home is parochial.
I understand that reading, and I reject it. What I’m describing isn’t a flaw in Australian nursing. It’s a limitation of any single environment, anywhere in the world. If a British nurse spent ten years at GOSH and then moved to a remote clinic in the Northern Territory, I guarantee they would experience the same acceleration of growth I did, just in different dimensions. They’d learn to practise with limited resources, to build trust across cultural divides, to make clinical decisions without the safety net of a tertiary centre twenty minutes away. Those skills would make them a better nurse, not because outback Australia is superior to London, but because unfamiliarity forces adaptation, and adaptation is the engine of genuine professional growth.
My argument isn’t that London is better than Australia. It’s that displacement is better than comfort. And it so happened that London was my displacement.
The Privilege of Discomfort
I want to name something that I think travelling nurses don’t talk about enough: the privilege involved in this kind of growth. I was able to move to London because I had savings, because I didn’t have dependants relying on me, because I had a recruitment agency that smoothed the visa process, and because I come from an English-speaking country that the NHS actively recruits from. Not every nurse has those options. The nurse in Ballarat who’s been doing extraordinary work for fifteen years and hasn’t had the opportunity to relocate internationally is not a lesser nurse than me. She may well be a better one. My growth came from circumstance as much as from effort, and I hold that truth alongside my controversial take without seeing any contradiction.
What I’d Say to Australian Nurses Now
If I could broadcast a message to every nurse in Australia – regional, metropolitan, new graduate or twenty-year veteran – it would be this: your skills are not small. Your experience is not provincial. And you are more prepared for international practice than you think.
Australian nursing education is rigorous. Australian nurses are resourceful, adaptable, and – this is something I didn’t fully appreciate until I worked alongside nurses from thirty different countries – exceptionally well trained in patient-centred care. The warmth and directness that Australian culture breeds into us is a genuine clinical asset in paediatric nursing, in emergency nursing, in every area of practice I’ve encountered. Do not let anyone, including yourselves, diminish that.
But if you have the opportunity to work somewhere that frightens you a little – somewhere that strips away your routines and forces you to rebuild – take it. You will not lose what you’ve learned. You will add to it. And you will come back, if you come back, with a perspective that no amount of experience in familiar territory could have given you.
Two years in London made me a better nurse than a decade in Australia. I stand by it. Not because Australia failed me, but because London forced me to grow in ways that comfort never would have.
And if my mum is reading this: yes, I know, I’m being dramatic. But I’m also right. And I’ll argue it over a cup of tea next time I’m home. You bring the Tim Tams.…

